Protect Our Parks · Santa Rosa Beach

Helen McCall Park

Better parks. Clear decisions.

We support better recreation facilities—and clear explanations of how construction affects the places families use today. Follow the evidence, understand the closure, and help fill the gaps.

Preliminary review · Updated October 13, 2026, 6:21 p.m. CDT

What we know How to help

What we know

Official minutes

Grass fields approved

On April 28, 2026, commissioners voted 5–0 to proceed with grass fields. Donna Johns moved; Danny Glidewell seconded. Brad Drake, Tony Anderson, Dan Curry, Danny Glidewell, and Donna Johns voted yes. Michelle Brown spoke.

Source 1 · Clerk minutes
Reported award

$7.46 million construction award

August 25 reporting identifies Empire Builders Group and a $7,455,792.85 award including two alternates. Signed award minutes and the executed contract have not yet been obtained for this review. Separate lighting and other costs mean this is not a verified total project budget.

Source 3 · Secondary reporting
Public notice / bid document

Two different timelines

The photographed county notice says construction begins October 19 and estimates 12–15 months; it does not show a year. The reproduced bid document allows 540 days to substantial completion plus 30 days for punch-list work. Public reopening could occur before contract completion; the actual schedule needs clarification.

Source 4 · Reproduced bidding document
Official minutes

Recent playground investment

The June 30 consent agenda included a $142,446 safety-surfacing award. Installation location, closure overlap, and protection of that work remain unverified. This does not establish wasted spending.

Source 2 · Clerk minutes

What still needs an answer

  1. Who authorized closing all amenities west of Moll Drive, and under what authority?
  2. What safety assessment supports the closure area and duration?
  3. Could the playground, splash pad, or other amenities stay open safely or reopen sooner?
  4. Did commissioners and residents receive specific information about the prolonged closure before the decision?
  5. What is the full project cost, including lighting, design, utilities, county purchases, and maintenance?
  6. Did the complete study evaluate closure impacts and alternative-facility capacity?

Public input: an important distinction

Public input about field improvements is documented. Public consideration of the prolonged closure remains unverified. The identified white paper compares turf and grass; its complete contents have not been reviewed. These are evidence gaps—not proof that no input occurred or that the county violated the law.

Follow the records

Records request status: Draft—not sent. The prepared request seeks closure authorization, amenity-specific schedules, safety and phasing alternatives, the full study, award votes, contracts, total budget, and closure-specific public input.

No statutory violation has been established. We will distinguish official records, secondary reporting, and unresolved questions as evidence becomes available.

Download the draft request Download the review packet

Open the printable brief

Write your commissioners

Personalize the letter below, then choose a commissioner or open a draft addressed to all five. Review the recipients and text in your email app before sending.

Open draft to all five commissioners

Email addresses checked against the official county commissioner directory on October 13, 2026. Messages sent to county officials may become public records. Avoid including sensitive personal information.

How to help

Share how you use the park, how the closure affects your family or program, or a public document that answers one of the questions above. Include dates and source links when possible. Please omit children's names and private personal information.

Email your experience or documents Find official county meetings

Messages go to Protect30A for review; they are not automatically published or submitted to the county. County responses and verified corrections are welcome.

Sources & update log

  1. April 28, 2026 official Clerk minutes — item 23, PDF page 9.
  2. June 30, 2026 official Clerk minutes — item 26, PDF page 5.
  3. August 25 meeting summary — secondary award reporting; primary award verification pending.
  4. Reproduced ITB 26-01, addendum 3 — schedule and scope; compare with signed contract. Official procurement portal.
  5. February 26 county meeting record — study request and discussion. April study agenda item 26-0498 — full white paper retrieval pending.
  6. County closure graphic provided by a resident — October 19, 12–15 months, western amenities closed. Original notice date and year remain unverified.

October 13, 2026: Initial preliminary review; request drafted. No county response received in this review. Source-access limits and missing records are identified above.

Prepared by ChatGPT for Doug Liles using the cited records and resident-provided notice. Updated manually; this page does not imply automatic monitoring.